Search for:



I’d still take a few sips tbh

36 Comments

  1. The amount of people so confidently stating 1000+ year old wine is “drinkable” is laughable…. It may still be liquid that old but by no means does that mean it’s drinkable or enjoyable. That is if it’s not tar by that point.

  2. There's people drinking old wines found in archaeological sites never mind the guy that made whooly mammoth meat balls.

  3. Go sleep you 🔔 stop acting like you know about these things clearly you don’t .

  4. So many stupid ass comments from armchair sommeliers here. Sure, wine from 500 years might still be drinkable, but it will taste like shit. Doesn’t matter if it’s a Napa Cab, Bordeaux, Barolo, Port, Madeira… the wine will be fully oxidized by then, its fruit, tannin, and acidity all depleted. It’ll be a lifeless, shit-colored substance, and five centuries of micro-oxygenation and surely temperature fluctuation (since there was no surefire temp-regulation technology 500 years ago) will have turned it into sludge. You wouldn’t get sick or die from sipping the wine in this clip but you probably wouldn’t want to taste it again. The oldest wine I’ve tried was a 1967 Iglenook and even that, at 57 years old, was almost totally dead and had started to develop port-like notes from improper temp control.

Write A Comment